[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [HAPS-L] Eponyms, tanning, and breast cancer [not related to each other]
Everyone,
I agree completely. Any anatomical term that is in common use should
be mentioned in our courses - we would be doing a disservice to our
students otherwise.
And certainly there are plenty of inconveniently long, or odd, or even
misleading [basal "ganglia"] terms out there. But unless we have a way
to completely remove older terms from use [obviously not possible] than
trying to replace them with more correct terms, even when the new terms
might be better and clearly descriptive, just gives everybody MORE
terms to learn. This does not feel like a benefit but a disservice to
our students!
Don't like Fallopian tube? Then use oviduct! But now we also get to
have "uterine tube". Is this tube part of the uterus? I realize that
it leads to the uterus, but now there are THREE [at least] terms to
describe this structure. It is not such a big deal for us instructors
to learn extra terms, but for students who are trying to learn this
material for the first time it can be very frustrating.
So if you don't like an eponym [especially one that is widely accepted
and in common use] I ask that you please just deal with it, and don't
try and subject the world to more and more terms.
My two cents....
Gary Heisermann
Department of Biology
Salem State College
Salem, MA 01970
gheisermann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx or garyheis@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Nov 17, 2006, at 9:53 PM, John Cornell wrote:
> To all,
>
> As long as eponyms (e.g., Fallopian tube, Purkinje Fiber) are being
> used we do a disservice to our students if we do not talk about them.
> Since anatomical terms are introduced by primary and secondary
> teachers, not to mention physicians, we can never be in complete
> control of the language, except in classroom. It many be fine to
> accept only the Auditory Tube on an exam, but we haven't done a good
> job if the ER physician refers to the Eustachian Tube and our now
> practicing student is lost.
>
> Who gets to decide that Falloppio is worth remembering, but Wirsung
> and Santorini are not? We all do, but it will probably be a painful
> process -- much like counting ballots in Forida.
>
> John
>
>
==============
To manage subscription,send email from the
subscription address to
imailsrv@xxxxxxxxxxx and in MESSAGE (1)
To unsubscribe from HAPS-L,
put : unsubscribe HAPS-L,
(2)To subscribe from a different address,
put : subscribe HAPS-L your_full_name
===============
3D
>From - Mon Jan 1 00:00:00 1965
X-Mozilla-Status: 0018
X-Mozilla-Status2