[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [HAPS-L] another shot fired in the evolution wars

To: HAPS-L@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [HAPS-L] another shot fired in the evolution wars
From: clifford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 07:02:17 -0600
Delivered-to: sturcica@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200702151533859.SM00956@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200702151533859.SM00956@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: HAPS-L@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: HAPS-L-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)

David,
It would seem to me that any scientist would want to be aware of these types of issues that attack the credibility of the scientific endeavor. Whether the list is the best vehicle is another issue.
Craig Clifford

David Evans wrote:

Is anyone but evolutionary biologists still paying any attention to this? I really want to know how much interest you all have in this or any other PR item.

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/16692012.htm

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [HAPS-L] another shot fired in the evolution wars
  - From: David Evans

References:
- [HAPS-L] another shot fired in the evolution wars
  - From: David Evans

Prev by Date: [SPAM-URL-DBL] {Disarmed} Re: [SPAM-URL-DBL] Re: {Disarmed} RE: [HAPS-L] another shot fired in the evolution wars
Next by Date: RE: [HAPS-L] another shot fired in the evolution wars
Previous by thread: Re: [HAPS-L] another shot fired in the evolution wars
Next by thread: RE: [HAPS-L] another shot fired in the evolution wars
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread