full2.gif (11401 bytes)
Practice Test #4
Answers


1.  You are interested in studying the effects of semantic processing on the recall of a list of words.  You design an experiment where each person will be asked to view 48 words presented one at a time on a computer screen.   Each of the words will remain on the computer screen for five seconds.  During the five seconds that the word is on the screen the participant will be asked to either 1) say out loud the number of vowels and the number of consonant in each word, 2) say the word out loud, or 3) say the word out loud and then use the word in a sentence.   Therefore there are three different independent groups in this experiment, the count group, the word group, and the sentence group.  Use the following data to conduct an analysis of variance to determine if the there are any significant differences between the groups.  Make sure that your answer includes a) the hypotheses tested, b) the completed source table (including SS, df, MS, F, and p), c) the critical value from Table F, d) your conclusions about the significance of F, e) the HSD if F is significant, and f) the comparisons between the group means.

Count Word Sentence
8
7
5
6
9
10
7
12
14
10
9
10
13
14
21
20
18
17
16
22
19

I.  State your hypotheses

    Null hypothesis:  The type of task preformed while the word is on the computer screen will not make a difference in the number of words remambered..

    Research hypothesis:  The type of task preformed while the word is on the computer screen will make a difference in the number of words remambered.

II.  After stating the hypotheses, always begin an analysis of variance problem by computing all required sums.

Count Word Sentence  
8
7
5
6
9
10
7
12
14
10
9
10
13
14
21
20
18
17
16
22
19
ans4 1w 1.gif (1352 bytes) ans4 1w 2.gif (1366 bytes) ans4 1w 3.gif (1352 bytes) ans4 1w 4.gif (1448 bytes)

III.    Compute SStotal

    ans4 1w 5.gif (1652 bytes)

IV.    Compute SSbg

    ans4 1w 6.gif (2584 bytes)

V.     Compute SSwg

    ans4 1w 7.gif (1240 bytes)

VI.    Compute dftotal

    dftotal = Ntotal - 1 = 21 -1 = 20

VII.   Compute dfbg

   dfbg = k-1 = 3 - 1 = 2 

VIII.  Compute dfwg

    dfwg = (n1-1) +  (n2-1) + (n3-1) = (7-1) + (7-1) + (7-1) 
    dfwg = 6 + 6 + 6  = 18

IX.    Compute MSbg

    ans4 1w 8.gif (1236 bytes)

X.     Compute MSwg

    ans4 1w 9.gif (1191 bytes)

XI.    Compute F

    ans4 1w 10.gif (1202 bytes)

XII.   Find the critical value of the F ratio in Table F and determine the significance of F

    A.  Critical Value at 2 and 18 degrees of freedom = 3.55
    B.  F>3.55 therefore F is significant.  We can reject the null hypothesis.  The probability of getting an F ratio this large just by chance is <.05.

XIII.  Create the Source Table

Source SS df MS F p
Between 479.143 2 239.572 60.620 <.05
Within 71.143 18 3.952    
Total 550.286 20      

XIV.  Because F is greater than the critical value we must compute the HSD

    A.  MSwg = 3.952
    B.  n = 7    (Hint:  The number of scores in each group)
    C.  q = 3.61    (Hint:   To enter table Q use k = 3...k is the number of groups...and dfwg = 18)
    D.  Compute HSD

    ans4 1w 11.gif (1537 bytes)

XV.  Compare all pairs of means

    ans4 1w 12.gif (1950 bytes)

XVI.  Conclusions

    Because the differences between all three pairs of means were all greater than the HSD all the group menas were significantly different from one another.   Participants in the sentence condition remembered the most words, participants in the word condition remembered the second most words, and the participants in the count condition remembered the least number of words.  Therefore the best technique for memorizing a list of words is to process the words as much as possible by using the words in a sentence.


2. Everyone knows that "two eyes are better than one."  But is that true in all situations?  As a psychologist studying perception you decide to investigate this saying by asking participants to complete a common depth perception task using one eye or using two eyes.  The task involves using a device to align two movable rods.  When the rods are perfectly aligned the participant's depth perception would be perfect, but when the rods are misaligned the depth perception is in error.   The dependent variable in this experiment is the amount of misalignment measured in millimeters.  If the experiment stopped there we would analyze the data using a t-test, but lets make the experiment a little more complicated.  In addition to viewing the depth perception device with 1 or 2 eyes suppose that we also ask the participants to perform the task with either their head held stationary, with their head held in a device that passively moved their head back and forth at a steady rate, or with the participant him/herself moving their head back and forth at a steady rate.  In this experiment we decide to use 5 different participants in each of the six possible conditions for a total of 30 participants.  Use the following data to conduct an analysis of variance to determine if the there are any significant differences between the groups.  Make sure that your answer includes a) the hypotheses tested, b) the completed source table (including SS, df, MS, F, and p), c) the critical value from Table F, d) your conclusions about the significance of F, e) the HSD if the F for the columns is significant,  f) the comparisons between the group means if the F for columns is significant, g) a graph of the interaction if it is significant, and h) your conclusions and interpretation of the graph.

  Stationary
C1
Passive Moving
C2
Active Moving
C3
One Eye
R1
31
33
26
35
37
14
13
12
15
17
13
12
11
10
14
Two Eyes
R2
10
8
11
12
13
8
7
9
10
8
6
9
7
4
6

 

Because there are 2 rows and 3 columns this makes this problem a 2 by 3 two-way analysis of variance.  To begin any two-way analysis of variance we must first compute all the means and all the sums for the cells, rows, and columns. To make the table easier to read and use I have replaced the data in each cell with the appropriate sums and means.  (Refer to the table at the top of the problem if you want to see the actual data rather than the sums.)

    Type of Motion    
  Stationary
(Column 1)
Passive
(Column 2)
Active
(Column 3)
 
One Eye
(Row 1)
ans4 2w 1.gif (1333 bytes) ans4 2w 2.gif (1321 bytes) ans4 2w 3.gif (1290 bytes) ans4 2w 7.gif (1427 bytes)
Two Eyes
(Row 2)
ans4 2w 4.gif (1310 bytes) ans4 2w 5.gif (1299 bytes) ans4 2w 6.gif (1294 bytes) ans4 2w 8.gif (1420 bytes)
  ans4 2w 9.gif (1413 bytes) ans4 2w 10.gif (1402 bytes) ans4 2w 11.gif (1377 bytes) ans4 2w 12.gif (1556 bytes)

I.  We always begin by stating our Null and Research Hypotheses for all three F ratios

    A.  Rows
            H0:   There is no difference between the amount of error with one eye and the amount of error with two eyes.
            H1:   There is a difference between the amount of error with one eye and the amount of error with two eyes.

    B.  Columns
            H0:   There will be no difference in the amount of error between the types of head motion.
            H1:   There will be a difference in the amount of error between the types of head motion..

    C.  Interaction
            H0:   There is no interaction
            H1:   There is an interaction

II.  The Source Table.....To complete the two-way analysis of variance we will fill out the following source table:

Source of Variation

Sums of
Squares
Degrees of
Freedom
Mean Square F p
Rows          
Columns          
Interaction          
Within          
Total          

III.  Compute Sums of Squares

    A.  Sums of Squares Total (SStotal)

ans4 2w 13.gif (1678 bytes)

    B.  Sums of Squares Rows (SSr)

ans4 2w 14.gif (2606 bytes)

    C.  Sums of Squares Columns (SSc)

ans4 2w 15.gif (2797 bytes)

    D.  Sums of Squares Within Groups (SSwg)

ans4 2w 16.gif (2964 bytes)

    E.  Sums of Squares Interaction (SSrxc)

ans4 2w 17.gif (1777 bytes)

    F.  Copy the Sums of Squares to the source table

Source of Variation

Sums of
Squares
Degrees of
Freedom
Mean Square F p
Rows 907.50        
Columns 880.867        
Interaction 421.400        
Within 129.200        
Total 2338.967        

IV.  Compute degrees of freedom

    A.  Degrees of Freedom Total (dftotal)
            dftotal = Ntotal - 1 = 30 -1 = 29

    B.  Degrees of Freedom Rows (dfr)  
            dfr = nr - 1 = 2-1 = 1

    C.  Degrees of Freedom Columns (dfc)  
            dfc = nc - 1 = 3-1 = 2

    D.  Degrees of Freedom Interaction (dfrxc)
            dfrxc = dfr · dfc = 1 · 2 = 2

    E.  Degrees of Freedom Within (dfwg)

            dfwg = Ntotal - Number of Cells = 30-6 = 24

    F.  Copy Degrees of Freedom to the Source Table

Source of Variation

Sums of
Squares
Degrees of
Freedom
Mean Square F p
Rows 907.50 1      
Columns 880.867 2      
Interaction 421.400 2      
Within 129.200 24      
Total 2338.967 29      

V.  Compute Mean Squares

    A.  Mean Square Rows (MSr)

            ans4 2w 18.gif (1180 bytes)

    B.  Mean Square Columns (MSc)

            ans4 2w 19.gif (1246 bytes)

    C.  Mean Square Interaction (MSrxc)

            ans4 2w 20.gif (1161 bytes)

    D.  Mean Square Within (MSwg)

            ans4 2w 21.gif (1184 bytes)

    E.  Copy Mean Squares to the Source Table

Source of Variation

Sums of
Squares
Degrees of
Freedom
Mean Square F p
Rows 907.50 1 907.500    
Columns 880.867 2 440.434    
Interaction 421.400 2 210.700    
Within 129.200 24 5.383    
Total 2338.967 29      

VI.  Compute the F ratios

    A.  F ratio for Rows (Fr)

            ans4 2w 22.gif (1214 bytes)

    B.  F ratio for Columns (Fc)

            ans4 2w 23.gif (1230 bytes)

    C.  F ratio for Interaction (Frxc)

            ans4 2w 24.gif (1184 bytes)

    D.  Copy F ratios to the Source Table

Source of Variation

Sums of
Squares
Degrees of
Freedom
Mean Square F p
Rows 907.50 1 907.500 168.586  
Columns 880.867 2 440.434 81.819  
Interaction 421.400 2 210.700 39.142  
Within 129.200 24 5.383    
Total 2338.967 29      

VII.  Conclusions and Significance of the F ratios

    A.  Fr
        1.  Critical value with (1,24) degrees of freedom = 4.26
        2.  Fr = 168.586 this is greater than the critical value.  Therefore we reject the H0 for Rows.
                The probability of this F ratio happening just by chance is <.05.
        3.  Two eyes are better (fewer errors) than one eye.

    B.  Fc
        1.  Critical value with (2,24) degrees of freedom = 3.40
        2.  Fc = 81.819 this is greater than the citical value.  Therefore we reject H0 for Columns.
                The probability of this F ratio happening just by chance is <.05.
        3.  Because there are three different columns we must now compare the means
                from each column with each of the other column means using the HSD.
            a.  Find the value of q in table Q with k, the number of groups being compared,
                    equal to 3 and the degrees of freedom within groups equal to 24.
                    q = 3.53
            b.  Compute the HSD

        ans4 2w 25.gif (1588 bytes)

            c.  Compare the column means

ans4 2w 26.gif (1867 bytes)

         4.  The mean error for the stationary condition was significantly larger than that for both the passive and active head motion.  But there was no significant difference between the active and passive head motion conditions. 

    C.  Frxc
        1.  Critical value with (2,24) degrees of freedom = 3.40
        2.  Frxc = 39.12 this is greater than the critical value.  Therefore we reject H0 for Interaction.
                The probability of this F ratio happening just by chance is <.05.
        3.  Because the interaction is significant we must now graph the cell means.
                Remember that when creating this graph use the dependent variable as the Y axis label
                and either rows or columns, which ever has the most groups, as the X axis label.

2waytestansgraph.gif (4657 bytes) 

        4.  As you can clearly see from the graph the interaction occurs because the addition of head motion, either active or passive, to the one eye condition decreases the error rate significantly, whereas there is a minimal effect of the head motion in the two eye condition.    

VII.  The final completed Source Table

Source of Variation

Sums of
Squares
Degrees of
Freedom
Mean Square F p
Rows 907.50 1 907.500 168.586 <.05
Columns 880.867 2 440.434 81.819 <.05
Interaction 421.400 2 210.700 39.142 <.05
Within 129.200 24 5.383    
Total 2338.967 29      

[Top of Page]
[Course News] [Course Outline] [Chapter Outlines] [Homework] [Practice Tests] [Dr. Vernoy]

Copyright © 2004 by Mark W. Vernoy